Skip to main content

Extreme Rainfall Analyses Can Point to Right Size for Culverts

Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons.

Art DeGaetano, Northeast Regional Climate Center.

Across most of the United States, the heaviest rainfall events have become heavier and more frequent. New tools can help decision makers choose culverts with appropriate capacities for the future.

[[nid:698 view_mode=sidebar]]

Considering culverts

Laura Sager is the Executive Director of the Soil and Water Conservation District in Columbia County, New York. Among a range of important topics that occupy her days, Sager spends an increasing amount of time on a topic that many people consider mundane: she’s thinking about culverts.

Culverts—simple tubes or tunnels that channel water beneath roads, railroads, and trails—are a hallmark of the developed world. Wherever humans can engineer relatively small amounts of water to flow through a tube beneath a roadway, the road is smoother and travel speeds along it are higher. Culverts serve as miniature bridges, keeping roadways high and dry, just above flowing water that could erode them away.

Heavy precipitation

The reason culverts are commanding Sager’s attention is rain. Across the contiguous United States, and especially in the Northeast, the amount of precipitation falling in very heavy events has increased significantly over the last century. During heavy rains, huge volumes of water fill drainage systems quickly, and can overwhelm installed culverts.

[[nid:699 view_mode=sidebar]]

When a culvert cannot convey the amount of water attempting to flow through it, water typically backs up on the upstream side, causing localized flooding. The accumulated water may overflow across the roadway, disrupting transportation and increasing erosion that can wash out the culvert.  Sediment and debris from an upstream failure may cause additional failures downstream, flooding other roads, houses, and cropland. Even small-scale flooding at undersized culverts can degrade water quality, erode stream banks, block access to habitat for aquatic organisms, and damage private and municipal property.

To avoid these issues and keep drainage systems functioning, Sager needs to identify the culverts in her district that are too small for the volume of water that may come their way. With hundreds of culverts of varying size and purpose across the county, she also needs data that can help her identify the most important culverts for replacement.

A wealth of historical climate data

Climate records are a key resource engineers use to select appropriate diameters for culverts in various locations. Culverts shouldn’t be too small, as the frequent flooding that would result leads to societal disruptions and environmental damage. Culverts shouldn’t be too large either, as their cost would inflate the price to complete projects.

Statistical analyses of extreme rainfall data from the Global Historical Climatology Network-Daily database can be helpful for calculating appropriate diameters for culverts. These analyses, available through NOAA Atlas 14, provide estimates for the recurrence interval of extreme rainfall amounts. For instance, the Atlas reports that in Rhinebeck, New York, an eight-inch rainstorm can be expected to occur once every 100 years, while storms that produce at least seven inches of rain are twice as likely. With this information, Sager can assess the climatological risk of particular culverts failing in any given year, and weigh the economic, societal, and environmental costs against the benefits of installing new culverts.

But what about the future?

Unfortunately, the observed increase in frequency of extreme precipitation events shows that the past is no longer an adequate guide for the future. Culverts that were of an adequate size when they were installed decades ago are now prone to flooding and failure. Sager faces a dilemma: should she rely on the historical data which may not reflect conditions 10, 20, or 50 years into the future, or should she install larger culverts—oversized by current standards—that will be adequate to accommodate future rainfall extremes? 

Updated data and new tools

Work conducted by NOAA’s Northeast Regional Climate Center at Cornell University, with funding through NOAA’s Sectoral Applications Research Program, is providing Sager and her colleagues with several additional resources to help solve this quandary. Annually updated extreme rainfall analyses collected as part of the Extreme Precipitation in a Changing Climate project (see sidebar) provide a perspective as to how quickly values describing a 100-year storm are changing. Similarly, global climate model projections for future extreme rainfall also provide indications of how the current trend may continue in the future. Finally, online tools based on hydrological models that account for land use and topography can inform users about the volume of runoff expected under different conditions.

These tools allow Sager to develop her own scenarios for the future, incorporating changes in basin characteristics such as increased development or enhanced retention, to help her select appropriately sized culverts for various locations. Engaging with stakeholders and evaluating a range of culverts is also helping Sager identify which culverts are the most critical to replace. One culvert at a time, Sager is helping build Columbia County’s climate resilience, and her success is convincing municipal partners and funding agencies to join the effort.

Scale of Decision
Region